Anyone getting good accuracy out of TAC in 223? - AR15. COM So far, TAC has been pretty atrocious in my WOA 20" Predator barrel MP518 (Staball Match) routinely gets me under 1", but TAC has been more like 1 5-2 5" groups Before writing off TAC altogether: Is it more accurate at lower velocities? Most of my loads have been pretty hot, but maybe it likes running a little slower? I've tried 77 69 52 SMKs, 77gr Barnes Matchburners, 75gr Hornady BTHP, and
Probably going to get flak but . . . my Bul Armory Tac Pro seems to be a . . . He was looking at the Tac Comp which was significantly cheaper than Staccato XC Only downside I see with the Bul is it doesn’t use standard 2011 mags So you’ll have to get Bul mags or MBX mags made for Bul guns I have a few of the mbx bul mags They are trash The followers look like they were 3d printed and carved on by a child and one
TAC load data for . 223 and 5. 56 from the source - AR15. COM My plinking load for 55 gr pills out of a 16" 1 in 7 twist is 25 3 gr TAC and a CCI 400 which chronos at 2700fps The initial Ramshot data placed this load as a MAX load which it obviously wasn't 25 3 grains is just barely above the start load in the new data but then again these new specs are for an M-193 power load not a plinking load
Lets see some 223 556 favorite loads using Ramshot TAC powder . . . I am just beginning to load 223 556 and bought eight pounds of Ramshot TAC I love the way it pours Similar to the W231 HP-38 I like in pistol loads I was disappointed that the loads by powder sticky in this forum doesn't include such a popular powder So, we will start our own, sticky or not Please include a barrel description with all the usual data EDIT: Thanks, folks But those loads
Powder recommendation for. 223 w 75 BTHP gt; Reloading gt; AR15. COM TAC has been a winner for me 62gr plinking loads at 24gr, 77gr Sierras+Swifts loaded to mag length with 24 5gr for accuracy, and numerous warm charges while experimenting with defensive bullets (Fusion, SMK TMK, TSX, TBBC) CCI 400s for 223 pressure, 450s or 41s for NATO pressure
Any good load data for a 75 grain Hornday . 223? - AR15. COM I've found that Ramshot TAC powder works very well with Hornaday's bullets in my RRA, Wylde Chambered, 1:9 A-4 AR using a few 1 10ths grain under max charge in my 5 56 X 45 MM NATO level loads (where my rifle's accuracy node is) Surprisingly, my rifle likes Hornady and TAC better than Sierra and Varget Go figure
Ramshot Tac and . 223 gt; Reloading gt; AR15. COM I've used TAC, mostly with Sierra and Hornady bullets in the 65-75 grain range in Colt 1 in 7" barrels Flows well through a measure and generally provides good accuracy, but I've usually found H4895 will make at least slightly more accurate loads
Reloading 6. 5 grendel, any tips or suggestions on powder . . . - AR15. COM Started with 6 5 on my new AR build I've got TAC, Varget, and CFE223 on hand Any other great powders for 123 grain loads that I should be looking at? Shooting from a 20" barrel Per my Lyman manual Varget looks like a great powder but its pricey
Best powders for particular grain ranges of bullets in 223 556 - Your . . . I have used two powders for heavy bullets in 223 - TAC and Varget I only use 75 gr Hornady HPBT-M and Sierra 80 gr MatchKings Every time I test, Varget yields better accuracy than TAC (1 2 MOA vs 3 4 MOA at 200 yards) For me, in my measure, using my technique, Varget meters better than most extruded powders (SD = 0 1 gr) TAC throws with SD = 0 014 gr, however, this low dispersion of charge