What is the difference between statically typed and dynamically typed . . . Statically typed languages: each variable and expression is already known at compile time (int a; a can take only integer type values at runtime) Examples: C, C++, Java Dynamically typed languages: variables can receive different values at runtime and their type is defined at run time (var a; a can take any kind of values at runtime)
What is the difference between a strongly typed language and a . . . strongly typed vs weakly typed; statically typed vs dynamically typed; Strongly typed means, a variable will not be automatically converted from one type to another Weakly typed is the opposite: Perl can use a string like "123" in a numeric context, by automatically converting it into the int 123 A strongly typed language like python will
dictionary - What are the main differences of NamedTuple and TypedDict . . . A simple typed namespace At runtime it is equivalent to a plain dict whereas a NamedTuple is a "tuple subclass " Note that Named tuple instances do not have per-instance dictionaries, so they are lightweight and require no more memory than regular tuples and NamedTuple subclasses can also have docstrings and methods
How to automatically convert strongly typed enum into int? The a::LOCAL_A is what the strongly typed enum is trying to achieve, but there is a small difference : normal enums can be converted into integer type, while strongly typed enums can not do it without a cast So, is there a way to convert a strongly typed enum value into an integer type without a cast? If yes, how?
C++ Multiple parameters with GTest TYPED_TEST - Stack Overflow You can write googletest TYPED_TESTs in which TypeParam assumes values from a list of std::pair<X,Y>, for paired parameter-types X and Y, so that each instantiation of such a TYPED_TEST has X defined as TypeParam::first_type and Y defined as TypeParam::second_type E g: gtester cpp
terminology - Static Dynamic vs Strong Weak - Stack Overflow There are different degrees of "type weakness" A strongly-typed language could attempt conversions from strings to numbers On the other hand, HyperTalk (a language I used decades ago) was so weakly typed that "12" + "34" would equal "46", but "12" + "34Q" would equal "1234Q" [fortunately, one could write "12" "34" if one wanted
Where to use ArrayBuffer vs typed array in JavaScript? Typed arrays are an excellent way to pack binary data for sending over the net, to server or via web sockets and things like data-channels for WebRTC If you deal with audio, video, canvas, or media recording, there is often no way around using typed arrays The keys for using typed arrays are performance and memory
types - Is JavaScript an untyped language? - Stack Overflow Thus far, JavaScript can be categorized as Not-Strongly-Typed That either means it's weakly-typed or un-typed dynamic static can be thought of in relation to how the language instructions manipulate types Dynamically typed means the value's type is enforced, but the variable simply represents any value of any type
Pros and cons of weak and strong typing - Stack Overflow Finally, with a strongly statically typed language (like Java, Ada, OCaml, Haskell, ) some mistakes can be uncovered at compile time and hence reduce the risk to provide an bugged program (but the release occurs later)