Difference between ‘determinism’ and ‘fatalism’ Fatalism is a form of deterministic thinking – not determinism per se, but the attitude created by thinking that the world is determined in such and such a manner For example social Darwinism is a form of deterministic thinking that arises from adopting beliefs about how one thinks the world is determined, based on superficial theory
Fatalism vs Determinism vs Free-Will - Philosophy Stack Exchange Fatalism can be more abstract, derivative of bivalence about future propositions Perhaps one might speak of fatalism as "top-down" determinism, whereas determinism as usual is "bottom-up " Either way, the issue for libertarian free will is the issue of alternative possibilities, where these possibilities are not ethereal but grounded in specific agents making specific choices at specific
Does providence imply the same thing as fate in Christianity? Any such necessity would nullify God's omnipotence A clash here between fatalism and providence : how could God direct all the affairs and events of human life towards the realisation of perfect ends, constrained by the inexorable necessity of fate ? Fate - 2 Some varieties of Christianity do assume a fate created by God
How to understand the reasoning behind modern Fatalism? Richard Taylor’s fatalism But foreknowledge of the truth would not create any truth, nor invest your philosophy with truth, nor add anything to the philosophical foundations of the fatalism that w
modal logic - Does the Principle of Sufficient Reason imply everything . . . It's called "modal fatalism, the view that there are no contingent truths": and yes, at least some philosophers say the PSR (on which the literature is vast) means there are no contingent facts Peter van Inwagen argues that a variant on "Spinoza's PSR-based argument for modal fatalism" leads to an absurdity, specifically modal fatalism Peter van Inwagen (1983, pp 202–204) has formulated
Can fatalism be disproved by fate-changing magic? 1 Fatalism is a belief You can always be a fatalist Things may appear random or freely willed at the level that people can perceive, but there could always be a deeper level where they are predetermined We can prove this with a thought experiment Imagine a book
philosophy of science - Could the universe or any event within it have . . . Technically, no Metaphysical fatalism does not have to be implemented through causal determinism, although it is currently the only version with any following The reason is that alternatives have a distinct flavor of mysticism, a la inexplicable fate or divine predestination
What works or books would you recommend to understand Fatalism? Fatalism in the psychological sense is a different concept from fatalism in the philosophical sense, you can read this article for the latter (it talks about the difference in the intro)--which are you more interested in?
Are There Alternatives to Determinism and Stochasticism? For the sake of this question, superdeterminism and fatalism are variations of determinism, even though in the fatalist case there can, in theory, exist worlds which appear stochastic in spite of a predetermined history
Is there evidence for existence of destiny as opposed to free will? Logical fatalism is usually treated as sophistry logical puzzle since the time of Aristotle, and the other two require accepting some strong presuppositions It is quite easy to make a case for Destiny given an omnipotent omniscient deity for example, that would be theological fatalism