Difference between ‘determinism’ and ‘fatalism’ Fatalism For fatalists, all events in the universe are predetermined, usually by a deity who also knows the future, and there is nothing they can do (or not do) to change the future For example, suppose a man has been smoking cigarettes since he was a child, and now that he’s older, he knows about the negative health effects
Fatalism vs Determinism vs Free-Will - Philosophy Stack Exchange Fatalism can be more abstract, derivative of bivalence about future propositions Perhaps one might speak of fatalism as "top-down" determinism, whereas determinism as usual is "bottom-up " Either way, the issue for libertarian free will is the issue of alternative possibilities, where these possibilities are not ethereal but grounded in
modal logic - Does the Principle of Sufficient Reason imply everything . . . It's called "modal fatalism, the view that there are no contingent truths": and yes, at least some philosophers say the PSR (on which the literature is vast) means there are no contingent facts Peter van Inwagen argues that a variant on "Spinoza's PSR-based argument for modal fatalism" leads to an absurdity, specifically modal fatalism
Can fatalism be disproved by fate-changing magic? From a philosophical perspective, we would want to know if we're dealing with logical fatalism, theological fatalism, determinism, or something else If you check through Brandon Sanderson's Arcanum, you might find philosophically informed definitions of Luck, involving Intent, but such as can be spun bent, and which is theologically relevant
What works or books would you recommend to understand Fatalism? Fatalism in the psychological sense is a different concept from fatalism in the philosophical sense, you can read this article for the latter (it talks about the difference in the intro)--which are you more interested in?
Does providence imply the same thing as fate in Christianity? Fatalism-Some philosophers, notably Luis de Molina (1535–1600) and Alvin Plantinga, have held that God knows not only what actual people will freely do in the future, but what each possible free creature would have freely done in each set of possible circumstances, if fully specific; and that he had this knowledge at the creation
philosophy of science - Could the universe or any event within it have . . . Predeterminism and fatalism are alternatives which do not necessarily require determinism There can be more such similar nuanced theories that make events non-random yet not decided by the previous state either (but by anything else) All those could be called "Determinism without Causality"
Does existence of omniscient God imply Determinism? Whether fatalism is implied depends on resolving ambiguities in "omniscience", see SEP, Foreknowledge and Free Will If it is defined as knowing only "all there is to know" (which excludes free willed actions by definition as not knowledge-apt), or if God's "foreknowledge" is atemporal (hence not available within the timeline), like God himself
Do Aristotles three laws of logic apply to statements about the future . . . He made this exception exactly to avoid the logical fatalism (predestined future) There is no issue with identity and non-contradiction And there are ways to use more complex (modal, temporal) logics to resolve this issue while keeping even the law of excluded middle –
Can fate occur without god? - Philosophy Stack Exchange Another philosophy that comes to mind (but isn't nearly as helpful for your question) is fatalism It's an old idea, from originating Aristotle It's an old idea, from originating Aristotle Logical fatalism is the idea that no acts we do are truely "free" because before we made the act, it was already true that act would occur