In Aristotle, What does it mean for something to be predicated? If a property-bearer (anything that can be referred to, even in a Meinongian semantic ontology, has a respectively unique set of nuclear properties) bears certain property (s), then that predicate (the property it bears) obtains of, or is predicated of, the subject (the property-bearer, or thing that bears or has the property) If the sky can bear have properties, and blue is one such property
philosophy of science - Are random processes equivalent to . . . Both randomness and predictability are based on available knowledge ("personal experience"), that is not the essential difference between them The difference is that random processes follow a probability distribution, and hence, in some respects, are quite predictable Think of a sequence produced by tossing a fair coin It is random, but has, on average, equal numbers of heads and tails
Aristotle Categories Chapter 2 - Philosophy Stack Exchange The species in which the things primarily called substances are called secondary substances, as also are the genera of these species For example, the individual man belongs in a species, man, and animal is a genus of the species; so these—both man and animal—are called secondary substances Thus the individual man can be said "of" man, or in other words, 'man' is predicable of the
Determinism vs prediction - Philosophy Stack Exchange What is the difference between determinism and predictable I have heard classical mechanics is both predictable and deterministic , chaos theory is deterministic but unpredictable , quantum mechan
Aristotle Categories section 2 - Philosophy Stack Exchange See Aristole's Categories: The Four-Fold Division [Cat,1a16] Of things that are said, some involve combination while others are said without combination Examples of those involving combination are: man runs, man wins; and of those without combination: man, ox, runs, wins Here A introduces the basic concept of predicate ("thing said"): predicates are expressed by words that can only be used
logic - Is Socrates a substance? - Philosophy Stack Exchange Consider the following from Aristotles Categories: Substance, in the truest, primary and most definite sense of the word, is that which is neither predicable of a subject nor present in a subject
philosophy of science - Would truly random events be strictly . . . By truly random I mean something like "independent of an observer's ability to identify a pattern or find a cause" My personal opinion is that events without a cause can't exist (so I obviously can't give an example), and if they did, they would be equivalent to truly random events In other words, one can define a truly random event as an event without a cause (and, obviously, vice versa