United States v. Skrmetti - Wikipedia United States v Skrmetti, 605 U S ____ (2025), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that a Tennessee state law banning puberty blockers and hormone therapy for the treatment of gender dysphoria in minors did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
United States v. Skrmetti | 605 U. S. ___ (2025) | Justia U. S . . . United States, 323 U S 214, 216 (1944), overruled by Trump v Hawaii, 585 U S 677 (2018) The Court has also suggested that religion is a suspect class See Carolene Products, 304 U S , at 152, n 4 That determination follows from the First Amendment, which prohibits any impairment of the “free exercise” of “religion ”
United States v. Skrmetti - SCOTUSblog Holding: Tennessee’s law prohibiting certain medical treatments for transgender minors is not subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and satisfies rational basis review Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 18, 2025
The Supreme Court Upholds a Ban on Gender-Affirming Care . . . This Health Care in Motion will summarize the Skrmetti majority opinion, dis cuss the legal implications , and offer a brief forecast on future legal challenges along with other resources The Skrmetti Decision The central question before the Supreme Court was whether SB1 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Supreme Court Upholds Gender-Affirming-Care Ban | TIME The court's decision in the landmark U S v Skrmetti case is expected to upend access to healthcare for trans and nonbinary youth it permits the at least 25 bans that states have passed
Understanding US v. Skrmetti - Williams Institute On December 4, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U S v Skrmetti, a lawsuit challenging Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors This article explains the legal arguments made and the implications for transgender issues