What exactly does it mean to say something is grammatical? So what is judged to be grammatical at one point in time may be judged to be marginal, or outright ungrammatical, a hundred years later, say The number of speakers who follow the rule has dwindled and the number of people who violate it has grown Things can get a little complicated when the focus is language, not dialect
grammar - What differences and relationships are there between . . . 2 What differences and relationships are between nonstandard ungrammatical standard but informal? You ask a number of questions It is always difficult to respond to questions about a book where only a portion is quoted, and most people don't own this one
Is Whom did you give the book? ungrammatical? 14 Yes, (2) is ungrammatical You gave him the book is You gave the book to him after it goes through Dative alternation After flipping the direct object and indirect object, the to preposition disappears You can't do this with questions, so you need the to
grammaticality - English Language Usage Stack Exchange In this sense, the first example in your question is ungrammatical But the Encyclopedia Britannica goes on to explain that " [t]he traditional focus of inquiry has been on morphology and syntax, and for some contemporary linguists (and many traditional grammarians) this is the only proper domain of the subject "
Are these ungrammatical sentences? - English Language Usage Stack . . . 0 Yes, the first sentence and the second are ungrammatical What is the context of the first one? Are you supposed to restructure it? Or is it some sort of "fill in the blank'? The second sentence: "David had a stick with which to scare his ______" is missing an object An example would be: dog, brother, attacker, etc