oauth - JWT-bearer grant with JWT assertion vs. client credentials . . . Note that the JWT bearer token doesn't contain the client credentials and may have to be combined with client authentication For example, in the Microsoft On-Behalf-Of flow, the authorization server expects both a JWT bearer token as part of the grant and client credentials for authentication (either a shared secret or another JWT bearer token)
Do I need CSRF token if Im using Bearer JWT? Bearer tokens, or other HTTP header based tokens that need to be added manually, would prevent you from CSRF Of course, but sort of off-topic, if you have a XSS vulnerability, an attacker could still access these tokens, but then it doesn't become a CSRF bug
CORS request is not sending Authorization: Bearer lt;value gt; header Bearer tokens are not sent automatically They must be manually added by the client on every request As such, any site that uses bearer tokens as its only form of session authentication is automatically secure against CSRF and CORS misconfiguration, as the attacker will never know the value to send in the Authorization header (or, if the attacker does know, then they can just send the request
Storing bearer token in cookie for file retrieval in another tab The existing system involves storing the bearer token in a cookie to fulfill a customer request of not only downloading an attachment within the application but also opening it in another tab This
oauth - How is pop token more secure than bearer token? - Information . . . Bearer token if lost (during transit over the wire) can give the holder of the token same privileges as the genuine owner POP token is supposed to additional security by making sure that it has a component that is known only to the genuine owner
Multiple Bearer keywords in single Authorization header I have recently seen a web application that, while using Authorization header, accepted multiple Bearer keywords followed by a valid JWT token For example, all of the following headers would resul
Will Authorization: Bearer in request header fix CSRF attacks? Would this approach actually work to prevent CSRF attacks? Yes An attacker can't make a browser send a request that includes the authorization header with the correct bearer token This is for two reasons: The attacker can't set the authorization header The attacker doesn't know the correct value of the token, so they wouldn't know what to