Why is cold fusion considered bogus? - Physics Stack Exchange In the past, after Fleischmann and Pons announced their cold fusion results, in perfectly good faith, they were proven wrong by subsequent experiments What are the experimental realities that make Fleischmann and Pons style cold fusions experiments easy to get wrong? Would the same risks apply to this new set up?
physical chemistry - Widom-Larsen Theory - Physics Stack Exchange The renaming is simply an attempt by Cold Fusion folks to politically distance themselves from Pons and Fleischmann, and people have a name for distancing the original discoverers--- it's called "plagiarism"
Is there any reproducible tested evidence for Ni-H cold fusion? Palladium Deuterium cold-fusion certainly exists, as tritium was detected by Pons Fleischmann at Utah, at Bhabha, at Texas A M by two independent groups (Wolf and Bocris) and also at Los Alamos (but the fellow was not allowed to publish)
Lorentz invariance of the 3 + 1 decomposition of spacetime Josep M Pons, "Generally covariant theories: the Noether obstruction for realizing certain space-time diffeomorphisms in phase space " Classical and Quantum Gravity 20 (2003) 3279-3294; arXiv:gr-qc 0306035 J M Pons, D C Salisbury, L C Shepley, "Gauge transformations in the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms of generally covariant theories"
Is Keshes technology for real? - Physics Stack Exchange Don't believe the naysayers that say Keshe technology can't be done there are plenty who have already done it! Look up Joseph Papp, Stanley Meyer, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, as examples of some of those who have worked with plasma or LENR
Why do whips hurt so much? - Physics Stack Exchange What exactly is the mechanism that makes a whip deliver such a strong impact? Elasticity, torque, or pressure? Just hitting something with a plank doesn't deal nearly as much damage What's the
Should we forget fusion and focus on geothermal power? It is clear from Pons and Fleischmann's seminal, era-defining work, that it is possible to use atomic scale chemistry to get fusion This is where the hot fusion money should have been diverted back in 1989, and some speculate that the prospect of losing money led the hot-fusion scientists to suppress Pons and Fleischmann's work
electromagnetism - Do primary first class constraints change the . . . There is also a nice discussion and possibly a very detailed answer to the exact question posted above, in paper by Pons, as well as in Sundermeyer 's book " Symmetries in Fundamental Physics " The bottom line is: isolated first class constraints (primary or secondary or tertiary ) do not, in general, generate gauge transformations
What are the challenges to achieving cold fusion? while this is informative, it is wrong to demand "peer review" in this case, as peer review is just censorship The stuff you link to, the "surface polaritons", the NASA stuff, the Rossi crap, this is the worst stuff in the cold fusion field There are hangers-on and frauds, the legitimate work is Pons Fleischmann, McKubre, Arata, and others related to this experimental setup It's Pd d not Ni