Equal versus Equals - English Language Usage Stack Exchange Equals is generally used unless using a verb "is" and the phrase "equal to" While reading 3 ft = 1 yd you would say "three feet equals a yard," or "three feet is equal to a yard"
Equal, is equal to, equals, are equal to - English Language Usage . . . Equals is correct, as is is equal to There are some instances when one might use are, but that would be limited to when a quantity separates are from equal to, and would sound correct, but not necessarily be mathematically correct
Arithmetic comparison: Equals, is equal to or is? Which of the following examples is are phrased correctly? Twenty divided by five is four Twenty divided by five equals four Twenty divided by five is equal to four Are all the options correct
Equals - a verb or not? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange But in the example in question, equals is not actually being used as a verb When used as a verb, equals is used in the following manner: X equals Y But here is a simplified version of the example sentence in question: They stood as equals In fact, if you look at the heading Recent Examples on the Web: Noun, you'll see the following example:
Word that means First Among Equals The only single words that I can think of that have ever been used to mean that have lost the meaning through the somewhat natural process where the "among equals" part becomes more or less of a joke: prince and its Latin root princeps In phrases, first citizen is commonly employed, and the plain Latin for first among equals, primus inter pares, has some history behind it
Is I believe x does not equal y the same as I dont believe x equals y I don't believe that x equals y simply means that a belief about the equality exists, but you do not share that belief If you substitute another verb for believe, the difference may be clearer: I know that x doesn't equal y I have actual knowledge that x and y are not equal Quite possibly I can show you facts to support this
Equal vs Equivalent: Finer differences in meaning and usage? in 4 . . . Equal means having some dimension in common (price, volume, meaning, etc -- This X is equal to that one -- whereas equivalent means 'is a satisfactory substitute for' And substitution requires a context Mostly any kind of "subtle differences" depend on the context, not the words Or else they're just individual habits that are felt to be universal because they don't contradict anything
verbs - Is equals to, as in one plus one equals to two . . . This wrongly conflates 'Two plus two equals four' and 'Two plus two is equal to four' In symbols, 2 + 2 = 4 The equals sign is equivalent to 'equals' (no matter whether the LHS, the preceding, is a single number or twenty) or 'is equal to' (no matter whether the LHS, the preceding, is a single number or twenty) It can be read out either way (the shorter way is, as you might expect, more usual)
X equals Y vs. X is equal to Y - English Language Usage Stack . . . In programming, when people read or dictate code, it is common for a spoken "X equals Y" to literally mean "x = y" which is an assignment "X is equal to Y", prefaced with e g "if" or "when" would be unambiguously used to indicate a check for equality, as in "x == y"