DeepSeek’s AI claims have shaken the world - NBC New York DeepSeek claims its R1 outperforms OpenAI's latest o1 model despite costing a fraction of the price the U S AI lab charges for its large language models The assertions have sparked concerns
AI-Washing Under Scrutiny: Texas AG Investigates DeepSeeks Claims . . . · AI Capability Claims: DeepSeek claims that its AI model rivals the most advanced systems globally, including OpenAI's Model o1 The investigation is scrutinizing these claims for potential misrepresentation or unfair competition under Texas law
Is the DeepSeek Panic Overblown? - TIME Here are several claims being widely circulated about DeepSeek’s implications, and why scientists say they’re incomplete or outright wrong Claim: DeepSeek is much cheaper than other
Is DeepSeek Legit? Breaking Down All Allegations This essay examines the three main points of contention: Alexander Wayne’s allegations about DeepSeek’s use of GPUs, the claim of stolen data, and the claim of DeepSeek being a side project
What is DeepSeek - and why is everyone talking about it? - BBC Deepseek says it has been able to do this cheaply - researchers behind it claim it cost $6m (£4 8m) to train, a fraction of the "over $100m" alluded to by OpenAI boss Sam Altman when discussing
DeepSeek may have used Googles Gemini to train its latest model Chinese AI lab DeepSeek released an updated version of its R1 reasoning model that performs well on a number of math and coding benchmarks Some AI researchers speculate that at least a portion