Cleanness vs Cleanliness - English Language Usage Stack Exchange It might help to consider that, on the one hand, cleanliness is derived from the dated adjective cleanly, which means (of a person or animal) habitually clean and careful to avoid dirt — Oxford Dictionaries On the other hand, cleanness is derived from the adjective clean, which has the following basic meanings: free from dirt, marks, or stains: morally uncontaminated; pure; innocent: free
What do we call a person who is obsessed with cleanliness? Is there any word for a person who is very , very much concerned about cleanliness and keeping things hygienic and even point out faults in clean things and explaining that they were dirty ?
Clean vs Clear - English Language Usage Stack Exchange Clean, as adjective, means: Free from dirt, marks, or stain (the room was spotlessly clean) Morally uncontaminated; pure; innocent (clean living) Free from irregularities; having a smooth edge or surface (a clean fracture of the leg) Clear, as adjective, means: Easy to perceive, understand, or interpret (the voice on the telephone was clear and strong) Free of anything that marks or darkens
Whats the proper way to handwrite a lowercase letter A? To answer your question simply: The proper (or at least normal) way to write "a" in handwriting is to write it "ɑ" without the arc above the loop The two ways to write lower-case a are called double-storey A (a) and single-storey A (ɑ) Single-storey is used for italics in most fonts But why are there two different As? Back in ye olde days there were many ways to write a lower-case A (The
What is the origin of the phrase Top of the morning to you? The phrase is Irish in origin but now very rarely used in Ireland (except as a sterotypical "Irishism") It simply means "the best of the morning to you" - perhaps from the idea of unhomogenised milk, where the cream rises to the top An appropriate response might be a simple "thank you" although the traditional response would be "And the rest of the day to yourself " Terrible attempts at
How do you quote a passage that has used [sic] mistakenly? That seems cleanest to me (most easily understandable), but doesn't preserve all the intention of the technique, which is to pinpoint exactly the part of the original that is in question That is, is it the " [sic]" that is the problem or something else like "from you"?
Why isnt there a comma in Unloose him Frodo!? The recent editions are the cleanest, but there remain many pirate versions out there, both in print and on the web, that are replete with egregious miscarriages of justice in conveying auctorial intent