What is the difference between kinematics and dynamics? A quick Google search reveals "dynamic and kinematic viscosity," "kinematic and dynamic performance," "fully dynamic and kinematic voronoi diagrams," "kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination," and many other occurrences of this distinction What is the real distinction between kinematics and dynamics?
Difference b w Kinetics Kinematics w concrete example Some websites out there say (ex ) explain that force is only considered in kinematics Does this mean for example Newton-Euler method is in kinetics and Lagrangian is in kinematics? I also prefer concrete examples in both category
kinematics - Is Retardation and Deceleration the same thing? - Physics . . . Deceleration and retardation used more-or-less interchangably to mean negative acceleration Because the velocity is a vector, this has a counter-intuitive meaning: Consider throwing a ball in the air The ball has some positive (up-directed) initial velocity, and a negative (downword) acceleration $-g$ (which is roughly $-9 8m s^2$) So the ball is "decelerating": The ball's velocity starts
kinematics - Are position, velocity, and acceleration total or partial . . . In general, when analyzing kinematics, how do we decide whether to treat velocity, acceleration, position, or time as dependent or independent variables? Is time always the independent variable, or can it sometimes be treated as dependent? I'm struggling with the concepts of explicit and implicit dependence of variables