What is the difference between a dieresis and an umlaut? The simplest summary is: Umlaut is a German phenomenon, while dieresis is used mostly in French (see examples above) At a closer look they look similar but convey totally different meanings: Dieresis indicates that two vowels are to be pronounced separately, whereas umlaute originally symbolized ae (ä), oe (ö), or ue (ü)
orthography - Whats the standard rule for the use of hyphens and . . . “Manual of Style and Usage,” the stylebook used by the editors and writers of the New York Times provides the definition of dieresis under the heading of ‘accent marks’ as ‘In the Latin languages, the dieresis, also consisting of two dots is used to indicate that two adjacent vowels are pronounced separately, or that a normally silent
New Yorker Dieresis Rule; prosaic, unionized? Minor answer (1): Yes, but a dieresis, if any, in prosaic would be on the A, not the I -- it would be prosäic Minor answer (2): One makes sure that the topics of ionization and trade unions never come up in the same written sentence, so the contexts will determine In real language (i e, speech), there's never any confusion, of course
Is there an equivalent of diaeresis, but for consonants? Methemoglobin doesn't really need a dieresis When "t" and "h" were brought together in Ancient Greek, they combined to form the sound "th" (θ), as in cathode < Greek kathodos (κάθοδος) < kata-+ hodos The OED records both pronunciations with t h and pronunciations with θ for methemoglobin
Contemporary native English words with diacritics The trema in words like coöperation and naïve were diacritics that were used natively in English at one time, to mark diaeresis: two vowel sounds in a row (as opposed to a diphthong or single vowel sound marked by two letters)
orthography - Is it spelt naïve or naive? - English Language . . . The dieresis is optional Mostly it gets left off because people find it difficult to add it Mostly it gets left off because people find it difficult to add it Actually, spelling it "naïve" is seen less and less, at least in the U S , and is probably moribund if not actually archaic at this point here
orthography - What do the letters ï and ô mean? - English Language . . . The mark over the i in coϊncidence is a dieresis, used to show that the vowel is to be pronounced separately from the previous one They are hardly ever necessary in English, and I have not until now seen a dieresis used at all in coincidence
“Zoe” or “Zoë”: which is the correct spelling? [closed] As an English name, it is rarely spelled with the dieresis Some may be officially named Zoë, but they drop the dieresis, anyway Another name that rhymes is Chloe, which is never spelled with the dieresis in modern English