Why is shebang called shebang? - Unix Linux Stack Exchange The name shebang for the distinctive two characters comes from an inexact contraction of SHArp bang or haSH bang, referring to the two typical Unix names for them Another theory on the sh in shebang is that it is from the default shell sh, usually invoked with shebang [18] [19] This usage was current by December 1987, [20] and probably earlier
Multiple arguments in shebang - Unix Linux Stack Exchange On Linux, the shebang isn't very flexible; according to multiple answers (Stephen Kitt's answer and Jörg W Mittag's), there is no designated way to pass multiple arguments in a shebang line
Why does the she-bang begin with a - Unix Linux Stack Exchange Typically shebang refers to just the #! (! is typically called "bang", and it looks like "she" is a corruption of either "SHArp" or "haSH" for #) -- the whole line is called a shebang line It does intentionally start with a comment character for backwards-compatibility with things that don't know how to handle it; the ! is presumably just to distinguish it from a random comment starting the
Why is it better to use #! usr bin env NAME instead of #! path to . . . Testing: Since using a logical path — usr bin env to the interpreter in the shebang — is the most extensible solution allowing the same script to execute successfully on target hosts with different paths to the same interpreter, we'll test it — using Python, due to its popularity — to determine whether it meets our criteria
How can I use environment variables in my shebang? The shebang line is very limited Under many unix variants (including Linux), you can have only two words: a command and a single argument There is also often a length limitation The general solution is to write a small shell wrapper Name the Python script foo py, and put the shell script next to foo py and call it foo This approach doesn't require any particular header on the Python
Would it be best for PowerShell scripts to also have a shebang? Linux on the other hand uses the shebang for files marked as executable to find out which interpreter to use, so the shebang becomes crucial Do you think it would be best for PowerShell scripts to also have a shebang? For Windows machines it makes zero sense, for Linux machines it perfectly makes sense In the end it's up to you to decide
shell script - What is the function of bash shebang? - Unix Linux . . . A shebang can pop up in various forms It is simply an interpreter indication So a shebang of, let's say, #! usr bin perl would f ex be a "perl shebang" and indicate the perl interpreter as the interpreter for such a schript You could then call such a perl script like any shell script directly The same stands for any other script interpreter
shebang or not shebang - Unix Linux Stack Exchange In many environments, shebang lines are quite limited in terms of the number of arguments they can take If you're trying to use the environment (#! usr bin env) then if you want your script to be portable you can't add command-line arguments If you want something more complex than to simply specify one single interpreter, you're abusing the shebang and may or may not get the results you're