java - Unnecessary @SuppressWarnings (unused) - Stack Overflow This code gives 'Unnecessary @SuppressWarnings("unused")' in Eclipse Juno (latest version), but if I remove the @SuppressWarnings("unused"), I get "Constructor Method is never used" warnings in IntelliJ IDEA 11 1 3 The methods aren't directly used in the project, only by 3rd party products Jackson, JAXB GSON, so IntelliJ is right, I would
java - Mockito throws UnnecessaryStubbingException for stub defined in . . . Clean maintainable test code requires zero unnecessary code Following stubbings are unnecessary (click to navigate to relevant line of code): 1 -> at nl devillers mockito FooFactoryTest setup(FooFactoryTest java:69) Please remove unnecessary stubbings or use 'lenient' strictness More info: javadoc for UnnecessaryStubbingException class
Why should you remove unnecessary C# using directives? If you have a "solution" of many projects, unnecessary references between the projects will force the projects to be compiled in a specific order when in fact they are independent and can be compiled in parallel So remove unused using directives before you check for unused project references in a multiple project solution –
IDE0059 Unnecessary assignment of a value to i Avoid unnecessary value assignments in your code, as these likely indicate redundant value computations If the value computation is not redundant and you intend to retain the assignment, then change the assignment target to a local variable whose name starts with an underscore and is optionally followed by an integer, such as '_', '_1', '_2', etc
Unnecessary use of Boolean literals in conditional expression Therefore, the check and the literals are unnecessary and can be removed Though, because this is javascript you might want to double negate the condition before returning it, to force it to be a boolean So, the result looks like this: return !!found
How to resolve Unneccessary Stubbing exception - Stack Overflow The stray stubbing might be an oversight of the developer, the artifact of copy-paste or the effect not understanding the test code Either way, the developer ends up with unnecessary test code In order to keep the codebase clean maintainable it is necessary to remove unnecessary code Otherwise tests are harder to read and reason about
javascript - ESLint error no-unneeded-ternary - Stack Overflow Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising Reach devs technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand
Unnecessary unboxing in java - how to refactor the code? FWIW, i just hacked in both variants of FooBar and disassembled the code - as i suspected, they are both translated to the very same bytecode: Variant a public Double foo(int x) { return Double valueOf(x); } public Double bar(int x) { return (double)x; } public java lang Double foo(int); Code: 0: iload_1 1: i2d 2: invokestatic #2 5: areturn public java lang Double bar(int); Code: 0: iload_1
Disable Unnecessary escape character: \ no-useless-escape Unnecessary escape character: \# no-useless-escape Simply just remove whatever is mentioned in the warning In my case, I had \# in the warning, so I just removed it from the line which was mentioned in the warning