be agreed to with by - English Language Learners Stack Exchange They're all perfectly grammatical - as would be #4 This action was agreed by Jake, if we assume OP is just checking all permutations of to or nothing followed by with or by, which is what it looks like to me) It's semantically irrelevant whether to is present or not The difference is with Jake implies the speaker interacted with Jake to get that agreement (effectively, the speaker also
Agreed or agree? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange 12 I often see the following exchange on Internet forums: A: (some proposition) B: Agreed Why "agreed", not "agree"? Is it a contracted form of "have agreed" or the past simple? Is the form "agree" (I agree with you) acceptable too?
When to use is agreed? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange The bank balance is agreed with the bank statement I think this is grammatically incorrect It sounds a bit bothering The bank balance agrees agreed with the bank statement Does this one sound better? Anyone know which one is correct? When will we use is agreed? I think the subject-verb agreement is not correct in the first sentence
prepositions - Which one sounds more natural: agree to a price or . . . Which one sounds more natural: agree to a price or agree at a price? Here's some examples: We agreed at to the price with the customer, but then he changed his mind I offered $1000 for the car and she agreed to at that We agreed at to $100 for the job I have heard both used with the word "agree" but can't figure out which one is more correct and natural
Have agreed or agree? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange "I have agreed" - is a past participle tense of it, and it means, that "I have done the act of the agreement sometime ago, in the past, and it is active valid up until now"; however I don't specify when that agreement took place "I agree" - is a "simple present tense" of it, and it means, that I agree, either in general, or in the specific moment
I have read and agree agreed with the terms and conditions Agree is in the present tense, while agreed is in the past tense Because of the use of have, read is in the past tense Normally when we form a sentence with two verbs, and elide the same auxiliary verb from the second verb, we make sure that both are in the same tense This isn't always essential, but it's a common consideration
What does agreed modify in the sentence? - English Language Learners . . . 1 De Soto argues that, within many of the extralegal markets of the developing world, mutually agreed upon rules for distributing assets and recognizing property rights already exist I don't understand what 'agreed' modifies in the sentence, and what is the verb in the 'that' clause, which is the object of the verb 'argues'