What exactly is the difference between fallacy and sophistry? Sophistry by Accident Example: "Cutting a person with a sharp instrument is a crime Doctors do this Therefore, doctors commit crimes" Sophistry of the Irrelevant Conclusion Example: "Peter cannot win that football match He is unfriendly and grumpy" (a non-sequitur) Sophistry of Many Questions in One
How should the difference between rhetoric and sophistry be . . . The aim of rhetoric is to persuade (gain power) through argument, irrespective of character, norms, or end-goals Sophistry as they saw it fell into the dramaturgical mode: the effort to establish one's character as a superior debater, irrespective of the argument being made
Is sophistry useful? - Philosophy Stack Exchange So, today good politicians deride rhetoric and (small s) sophistry in others, and deny it in themselves, despite the fact that by any objective standard they all (or at least, all the successful ones) practice it wholesale Likewise, we disdain criminal defence lawyers for their sophistry in defending criminals, but admire it in prosecutors
The disdain for sophism in Platos dialogues vs. the real sophists It is possible that Aristophanes coined the “bad” use of sophists in this play Plato did use it in that sense but he also uses it in a neutral sense However, there’s some ground for saying that the concept of sophistry existed and that he expressed disapproval of that, as distinct from sophists
Is sophistry used as a performance art in modern times? Performance art in the modern sense is almost exclusively negative dramaturgy — social statements meant to distort, defame, disrupt, confuse, or otherwise attack the sincerity of other expressions of social power — so in that sense it would invariably be a form of sophistry But not all dramaturgy is negative
ethics - Modern Sophists? - Philosophy Stack Exchange I was wondering if in professional philosophy there are modern sophists That is, people who have no qualms publishing on both sides of an issue, perhaps not being able to themselves come to conclu
logic - What is the philosophical term for using half-truths to . . . Deliberate sophistry is a hyponym or type of lying, which is often defined broadly as any communication with the intent to deceive From a philosophical stand point in logic, the notion of interest is known as intentionality which is a technical term which does not mean 'to intend', but rather is construed more broadly and is often described as
What were the main sophistical methods according to Plato? Due in large part to the influence of Plato and Aristotle, the term sophistry has come to signify the deliberate use of fallacious reasoning, intellectual charlatanism and moral unscrupulousness It is, as the article explains, an oversimplification to think of the historical sophists in these terms because they made genuine and original
David Hume encouraged people to “burn” his works. Should we act like . . . Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion Hume confined the matters with which philosophy should concern itself and with which it is capable of dealing to (1) 'relations of ideas' and (2) 'matters of fact' (IV 1)