What exactly is the difference between fallacy and sophistry? Sophistry is disturbingly prevalent in contemporary culture, including in the behaviour of a variety of contemporary news and current affairs outlets, and in the commentary of politicians; institutions and people upon whom we would like to be able to rely upon for truth
How should the difference between rhetoric and sophistry be . . . The distinction between rhetoric and sophistry is not dependent on how you define truth Take two truths- one of which is a statement that corresponds with reality, the other a statement in accord with public consensus
sophistry - Is it rational to want to die someday, because if you live . . . Seems to be that if you can rationalize it, then by definition under that rationale, it is rational Whether that rationale applies depends on exact circumstances and your own personality Personally, I consider it irrational to actively want to die until the alternative becomes worse without reasonable hope of recovery to an adequate duration of adequate quality-of-life Wanting to be mortal
logic - What is the philosophical term for using half-truths to . . . Short Answer Technically speaking, the intentional use of misleading language is more in the domain of rhetoric than logic and is known as sophistry A fallacy is generally considered any persuasive argument of bad form See What is the philosophical term used to describe flawed logic? for more details on what constitutes a fallacy Long Answer Once one introduces the notion of having the
The disdain for sophism in Platos dialogues vs. the real sophists However, there’s some ground for saying that the concept of sophistry existed and that he expressed disapproval of that, as distinct from sophists What we need to do is to identify his target more precisely
Is ethics anything other than hand waving and sophistry? But, to answer your question: yes, ethics is far more than just sophistry and hand-waving Ethics and moral philosophy are very sophisticated and nuanced at this point in the history of philosophy, and there are many ways to approach them you might not be aware of A) Philosophy isn't necessarily concerned with "the universal"
Is sophistry useful? - Philosophy Stack Exchange A major aspect of Sophistry was the elaboration of persuasive techniques We might hear this now and cynically assume this means the art of lying, however, it ideally means the art of telling the truth Formal logic might be considered a persuasive technique in this sense
Is Humes Fork self-refuting? - Philosophy Stack Exchange Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding This is known as Hume's Fork By his own criterion, shouldn't we reject his own work? It's not any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number, nor is it any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and
Is sophistry used as a performance art in modern times? Performance art in the modern sense is almost exclusively negative dramaturgy — social statements meant to distort, defame, disrupt, confuse, or otherwise attack the sincerity of other expressions of social power — so in that sense it would invariably be a form of sophistry But not all dramaturgy is negative