What is the Constitutional precedent for military aid? Is there any Constitutional precedent for the claim that it is or is not within the rights or duties of the office of the President of the United States or of Congress to grant, to deny, or to suspend military aid, including any financial aid that may be used in part on military operations?
united states - What would happen if a US circuit court consistently . . . Fourthly, decision that fail to follow precedent are often (although not always) criticized by legal scholars, particularly in law review articles and treatises Fifthly, lower-court judges who often fail to follow precedents, are less likely to be recommended by senior judges for promotion to appellate positions
What makes the Nuclear Option in the US Senate a precedent that its . . . The precedent becomes part of the rules of the Senate Now suppose in future there is a cloture vote on an appointment, and it passes 52-48 (say) If the chair rules that this isn't enough there would be a point of order and the 52 votes would again overrule the chair
Has the US Supreme court ever altered its own precedent on the same . . . Carhart (2000) that the opinion reflected a curtailment of the state of Nebraska's constitutional authority to ban certain kinds of abortion, provided that the requirements of existing precedent were satisfied The existing precedent had been defined according to viability since Planned Parenthood v
international relations - Is there any precedent for refusing to . . . Is there any precedent for this? We welcome interim President Guaido’s directive to all diplomatic missions in Venezuela that Venezuela intends to maintain diplomatic relations with all countries The United States maintains diplomatic relations with Venezuela and will conduct our relations with Venezuela through the government of interim
election - Is there a precedent, in France, for barring a politician . . . "Precedent" does not even begin to describe it It is (sadly) so common that the high-pitched noises of some are quite misplaced From the French Wikipedia: Henri Emmanuelli (left), 1996, 2 years Alain Carignon (right), 1996, 5 years Alain Juppé (right), 2004, 1 year Michel Gillibert, 2004, 5 years Charles Pasqua (right), 2013, 2 years
Is there a precedent for a country attacking another and later . . . Is there a precedent for a country attacking another due to unverified information and finding out later they were wrong? And what was the international response? Narrowing scope: An event that was misunderstood by the attacking side that they later admitted was wrong (specifically of their own accord), but not as part of the post-war surrender
Precedent for a sitting President not residing in the White House? It's true that the white house is probably similar to a nuclear submarine on the inside, in terms of technology, and there is a huge military presence throughout the white house, it must be like being the guest of nato central command, which is a bit of a crap setting for a national leader
united states - Is there historical precedent for the US Senate to . . . And there is also a lot of precedent for that nominee being confirmed when the presidency and the Senate are controlled by the same party There is very little precedent for a nominee being confirmed when the presidency and the Senate are controlled by different parties (as was the case with Merrick Garland in 2016)